🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.